Tag Archives: live oak private wealth quarterly letter

Read our full investment commentary here.

“A 10% decline in the market is fairly common–it happens about once a year. Investors who realize this are less likely to sell in a panic, and more likely to remain invested, benefiting from the wealth building power of stocks.” – Christopher Davis

Market Statistics as of 3/31/25

The first quarter of 2025 (Q1-2025) was the worst for several indices (Nasdaq, S&P 500, Russell 1000 Growth) since 2022. Investors became increasingly concerned about AI-related stocks and their valuations, especially after the Chinese company DeepSeek unveiled an AI model that was much cheaper and used less-advanced chips but appeared to be a strong rival to prominent AI companies like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Google. The gains and valuations on these tech names have been enormous and perhaps it was only a matter of time before investors began to question their values. As you may recall, we have been talking about the valuations and concentration of the Mag 7 names for quite some time, and it began to feel like a broken record, but we know from experience that trees don’t grow to the sky.

As you can see from the chart above, gold was the best performing asset in Q1 followed by fixed income investments and value stocks (Russell 1000 Value), a stark contrast from Q4 2024 and most of 2024. Will this trend continue? That will be in the forefront of our minds. The tech heavy Nasdaq and S&P 500 had a rough go, and the Russell 1000 Growth Index was down almost 10% after being down even more during the quarter. Small caps (Russell 2000) have now entered into a bear market (> -20 %) over the last 52 weeks.

Within the S&P 500 market internals, Energy (+9.30%) was the leading sector followed by Health Care (+6.08), Consumer Staples (+4.58%), Utilities (+4.12), Financials (+3.11%), Real Estate (+2.72%) and Materials (+2.30). On the downside, the Consumer Discretionary sector (-13.97%) led the way and was followed by Information Technology (-12.79%), Communication Services (-6.41%) and Industrials (-0.53%).

As we have often emphasized, our primary concern is protecting our clients’ capital while generating strong risk-adjusted returns that ensure peace of mind. We maintain a laser focus on the companies we invest in and are prepared to make necessary adjustments when needed. Our investment team boasts a wealth of experience, having navigated numerous bear markets and corrections. Although each market downturn is unique, they are all driven by fear and greed. We hope our expertise and experience provide you with a sense of security and confidence.

Portfolio Activity in the First Quarter 2025

During the first quarter, our Value strategy exited its position in McCormick (MKC) due to price strength that appeared to be driven by investors seeking defensive stocks. As a result, we believed the stock price was unwarranted based on the company’s fundamentals. Additionally, we added to our Dollar Tree position (also owned in GARP strategy) as it was a very small position and with the recently announced sale of Family Dollar, we feel management will get back to their core business. We feel that DLTR overpaid for Family Dollar ten years ago and were glad to see them divest that troubled unit.

While there were no new purchases or sales in GARP or International strategy, the Investment Team is focused on the businesses we own and will make changes when we determine that a company is either overvalued, trading below our estimates of what it is worth, or our thesis has changed.

During recent conversations with clients, we have talked at length about the market being expensive, especially in certain names. During the first quarter we witnessed a selloff in companies that had recently been outperformers, and a rotation into other companies. Companies like Phillip Morris (+31%), Nestle (+23%), Safran (+21%), Sony (+19%), Roche(+17%) and Berkshire Hathaway (+17%) all had positive price performance during the quarter while the Magnificent Seven, now the “Lag 7”, dropped 15% (as defined by price performance of the Roundhill Mag 7 ETF).

*Not every client account will have these exact holdings. The actual holdings with respect to any particular client account will vary based on a number of factors including but not limited to: (i) the size of the account, (ii) investment restrictions applicable to the account, if any; and (iii) market exigencies at the time of investment.

“Success in investing isn’t about making a lot of money in a short period of time. It’s about earning reasonable returns over very long periods.”
– Bruce Flatt (CEO of Brookfield)

Thoughts from Tiburon

As soon as the quarter ended, Trump held his “Liberation Day” press conference announcing across the board tariffs, and the markets responded. As many of our readers know, markets hate uncertainty. The intraday moves have been massive and the news flow, or tweets, are changing the direction of bonds and stocks in an instant. Now it seems no one is really interested in what happened in the first quarter as everyone’s attention has turned to tariffs. Jamie Dimon, CEO of JP Morgan, said we are in a “wait and see” period. The folks at LVMH mentioned that we are in “unknown territories” when asked about pricing for the upcoming quarter.

The entire team at LOPW views every dollar that we invest as precious capital. We do not take this lightly. While we all agree that we are in uncertain times, we are committed to helping you navigate these times. I encourage everyone to reread the email that was sent out on Monday April 7th titled “Uncertainty is the only certainty there is…” to give you insight into our current thoughts.

Morgan Housel, an author and blog writer we follow, discusses volatility as the price of admission for equity returns. Similar to paying for a ticket to watch a game, or concert, you must be willing to accept the volatile times in order to earn the returns that equities have provided over time. This is not easy. With the machines controlling so much of the daily flows, the volatility is exacerbated, giving us days when the markets move over 4% in one trading day. While we want to use the volatility to our advantage (i.e., buying when things are ugly and selling when they appear over-valued) we also want to practice patience until we get more clarity. There are still many unknowns in the global economy. We might not get the visibility we desire in the second quarter. Earnings season has commenced, and the calls we have listened to are saying the same thing: “Wait and See.” The good news is that we are earning decent returns, holding cash and patiently waiting for the “fat pitch” across the plate.

We also encourage you to revisit your plan, to make sure that your goals and objectives are being met. During times like these, it is paramount to stay the course and not let outside noise force you into financial decisions that could have a long-term impact on your plan.

DISCLOSURES:
This material is not financial advice or an offer to sell any product and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any particular security. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The opinions expressed are those of the Live Oak Private Wealth Management Investment Team. The opinions referenced are as of the date of publication and are subject to change due to changes in the market or economic conditions and may not necessarily come to pass.

Live Oak Private Wealth is a subsidiary of Live Oak Bank. Investment advisory services are offered through LOPW, LLC, an Independent Registered Investment Advisor. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Live Oak Private Wealth, including our advisory services, fees, and objectives, can be found in our ADV Part 2A or 2B of Form ADV, which is available upon request.

This should not be construed as tax advice. You should always consult with your tax professional with regard to specific tax questions and obligations.


Read our full investment commentary and letter to clients by downloading the first quarter 2025 letter.

The Role of Trusts in Estate Planning.

The Role of Trusts in Estate Planning:
Insights from the Philip Seymour Hoffman Estate

When the Oscar-winning actor Philip Seymour Hoffman’s life and career abruptly ended in 2014 after passing away from a drug overdose at the age of 46, he left his heirs with a sizable estate valued at $34 million. Hoffman was survived by three children and a long-time partner, Mimi O’Donnell, who was also the mother of his children. Before Hoffman’s death, it was reported that he expressed a desire for his children to develop a strong work ethic and to avoid the potential pitfalls associated with being “trust fund kids.” Consequently, he bequeathed his entire estate outright to Ms. O’Donnell.

The phrase “trust fund kid” is prevalent in our popular culture, frequently carrying a negative connotation that individuals who benefit from trusts are excessively privileged and may not have to engage in work for their livelihood. In addition, the world of trusts in estate planning can seem complicated and complex and are often portrayed as vehicles that only benefit affluent families. However, trusts serve multiple significant and positive functions in estate planning, many of which contradict common misconceptions in cultural views about trusts.

Common Trust Objectives

For many individuals, a will-only based estate plan may be sufficient to accomplish their goals regarding the distribution of their estate to their designated beneficiaries. However, trusts allow for additional protections and strategies that a will-only based plan cannot offer.

By establishing a trust, the trust creator, also known as the grantor, can achieve a range of objectives. The most common include:

  • providing support for family in the event of incapacity, illness, or disability
  • avoiding the state-specific probate process and providing privacy for beneficiaries
  • reducing a taxable estate, thereby minimizing estate taxes
  • protecting assets from creditors and from divorce
  • establishing a legacy and supporting a valued charity

The various objectives and purposes of different types of trusts are crucial to understand for anyone considering their estate planning options. There are numerous types of trusts, each designed to fulfill specific needs and goals, such as revocable living trusts, irrevocable trusts, charitable trusts, and special needs trusts, among others. Each type of trust has its unique characteristics, benefits, and limitations, which can significantly influence an individual’s decision-making process regarding their estate plan.

Types of Trusts: Revocable vs. Irrevocable Trusts

Trusts can be classified as either revocable or irrevocable. A revocable trust permits the grantor to alter the trust terms during their lifetime while competent, whereas an irrevocable trust does not allow for any changes to the trust terms unless approved by the court or the beneficiaries of the trust.

The grantor’s purpose and objectives for establishing a trust determines whether a revocable or irrevocable trust is created. The modifiable nature of revocable trusts provides greater flexibility compared to irrevocable trusts, making them a popular planning option. However, assets held by a revocable trust are included in the grantor’s taxable estate and are subject to estate taxes upon the grantor’s death. Additionally, revocable trusts do not offer protection against creditor claims and lawsuits involving the grantor. On the other hand, irrevocable trusts cannot be altered once established; however, they can remove assets from the grantor’s taxable estate and provide asset protection benefits.

Revocable and irrevocable trusts funded during the grantor’s lifetime both provide privacy and avoid probate.

Types of Trusts: Testamentary vs. Living Trusts

Testamentary trusts are established upon the grantor’s death. A testamentary trust is created within the terms of the grantor’s last will and testament and remains inactive and unfunded until the grantor’s death. A grantor can amend their will during lifetime, but after death, any trust created within the will is irrevocable and cannot be changed.

In contrast, a living trust, also referred to as an inter vivos trust, is established before a grantor’s death and is administered by a trustee during and after the grantor’s life. Consequently, living trusts offer the grantor greater control over the management and execution of the trust compared to testamentary trusts, which are established upon the grantor’s death. Living trusts can be revocable or irrevocable.

Benefits of Utilizing Trusts

Returning to Philip Seymour Hoffman, what benefits could his estate have recognized if he had included trusts for his heirs in his estate plan?

  • Flexibility to Address the Decedent’s Wishes. Trusts can be tailored with specific provisions surrounding when and how heirs inherit assets, addressing concerns like those of Hoffman about “trust fund kids.” For example, a trust might require beneficiaries to earn their own income before receiving distributions, promoting a work ethic and financial independence.
  • Probate Avoidance or Minimization. Since assets held in trust typically avoid the probate process, it is likely that the Hoffman estate could have avoided the complexities and potential pitfalls associated with probate had he incorporated a revocable trust agreement into his estate plan.
    • Holding assets in trust offers more privacy for families, as trust assets typically remain out of public record, unlike those in probate. After Hoffman’s will was filed, The New York Post published it, exposing his wishes to the public. Unlike celebrities, most individuals face less scrutiny, but probate allows anyone to access details about a deceased person’s assets and beneficiaries, potentially leading to unwanted attention or exploitation.
    • The probate process can take months or years to complete. Assets held in trust can continue to be managed without interruption should the grantor or beneficiary die or become disabled. Upon death or disability of the grantor or a beneficiary, the designated trustee would continue to manage the property for the benefit of the successive beneficiaries. According to the New York County Surrogate’s Court online database, the Hoffman estate is not yet closed as of this writing, 11 years later.
    • The probate process can be expensive due to court costs and legal fees. In North Carolina, the Clerk of Court currently charges probate fees equal to 0.4% (or $4/$1,000) of the value of the estate’s probate property (up to a maximum of $6,000).
  • Tax Planning and Efficiency. Hoffman’s estate tax liability, which was approximately $15 million, could have been reduced had assets been placed in trust since the gift to his partner did not qualify for the marital deduction. The U.S. federal tax code allows for the transfer of assets between spouses without incurring estate tax at the first spouse’s death, effectively deferring the tax liability until the surviving spouse’s death. However, in Hoffman’s case, since the recipient of the gift was not a spouse, the transfer would not have met the criteria for the marital deduction.
  • Estate Planning Lock. The final allocation of Hoffman’s wealth to his children will be decided by their mother’s estate plan. What does this look like if their mother does not have a will? What if she marries and/or has additional children before her passing? Hoffman clearly believed that the mother of his children would provide for them appropriately; however, trusts offer the flexibility to incorporate these planning decisions into one’s own plan so that the plan is locked in at the initial wealth transfer. Following the death of a spouse or partner, life can evolve. Oftentimes when second families are involved, estate planning can become more intricate and nuanced. Trusts can be helpful tools for navigating those intricacies.

Reports indicate that Hoffman’s accountant and attorney recommended he designate assets for his children in his estate plan. The reasons behind Hoffman’s decision to disregard his advisors’ counsel will remain unclear; he was brilliant in his own right and may have wished to avoid the “tax tail from wagging the dog”, or simply wanted to uphold his desire that his children would not be overly reliant on inherited wealth while showing his trust in their mother to manage the estate responsibly and in a manner that would benefit their family as a whole. However, other estate planning objectives such as incapacity planning, privacy, probate avoidance, tax minimization, asset protection, and charitable goals are important for many. Incorporating a trust as part of your estate plan can help achieve these objectives and provide assurance that your assets will continue to benefit future generations. Trusts can be established in numerous ways, with virtually countless variations available; therefore, the guidance of a qualified estate planning attorney is highly recommended.

Live Oak Private Wealth offers trust and estate planning strategy discussions as an integral component of our comprehensive financial planning services. Should you have any inquiries regarding how various trusts may benefit your family, we would be pleased to discuss this with you.

 

DISCLOSURES:
This material is not financial advice or an offer to sell any product and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any particular security. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The opinions expressed are those of the Live Oak Private Wealth Management Investment Team. The opinions referenced are as of the date of publication and are subject to change due to changes in the market or economic conditions and may not necessarily come to pass.

Live Oak Private Wealth is a subsidiary of Live Oak Bank. Investment advisory services are offered through LOPW, LLC, an Independent Registered Investment Advisor. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Live Oak Private Wealth, including our advisory services, fees, and objectives, can be found in our ADV Part 2A or 2B of Form ADV, which is available upon request.

This should not be construed as tax advice. You should always consult with your tax professional with regard to specific tax questions and obligations.

 


Read our full investment commentary and letter to clients by downloading the first quarter 2025 letter.

Get Live Oak Private Wealth’s perspective on the shifting investment patterns and the impact on clients by downloading our 2024 Year-End Letter.

“It shouldn’t come as a surprise that the return on investment is significantly a function of the price paid for it. For that reason, investors clearly shouldn’t be indifferent to today’s market valuations.” – Howard Marks

Get Live Oak Private Wealth’s perspective on the shifting investment patterns and the impact on clients by downloading our 2024 Year-End Letter.


 

DOWNLOAD THE YEAR-END 2024 LETTER FROM LIVE OAK PRIVATE WEALTH

Read our full investment commentary and letter to clients by downloading the Q3 2024 quarterly letter.

“October: This is one of the peculiarly dangerous months to speculate in stocks. The others are July, January, September, April, November, May, March, June, December, August, and February.” -Mark Twain

What a difference a year can make in the capital markets! As we were writing the 2023 Q3 newsletter last year, it felt like chaos was reigning in the stock and bond markets.

 


 

Read our full investment commentary and letter to clients by downloading the third quarter 2024 letter.

Read our full investment commentary and letter to clients by downloading the Q1 2024 quarterly letter.

“The desire to perform all the time is usually a barrier to performing over time.” – Robert Olstein

As 2023 drew to a close, speculation around Fed Chairman Jerome Powell’s comments on potential rate cuts fueled a strong rally. The momentum continued into the first quarter of 2024, resulting in gains across all equity indices. However, the attitude towards interest rates now seems to suggest that rates will be higher for longer and how that will influence the market returns remains to be seen in the year ahead.

 


 
Read our full investment commentary and letter to clients by downloading the first quarter 2024 letter.

Read our full investment commentary and letter to clients by downloading the Q3 2023 quarterly letter.

“Patience and discipline can make you look foolishly out of touch until they make you look prudent and even prescient.” -Seth Klarman, The Baupost Group

“Nothing like price to change sentiment.” -Helene Meisler

As we write this 3rd quarter letter, we are and have been experiencing several major headwinds for the US economy and the US equity and bond markets. While this is nothing unique to investors and markets, it seems as if an abnormal number of issues are at the forefront of markets.

 


 

Read our full investment commentary and letter to clients by downloading the third quarter 2023 letter.

Read our full investment commentary and letter to clients by downloading the Q3 2022 quarterly letter.

“Restoring price stability will take some time and requires using our tools forcefully to bring demand and supply into better balance. Reducing inflation is likely to require a sustained period of below-trend growth. Moreover, there will very likely be some softening of labor market conditions. While higher interest rates, slower growth, and softer labor market conditions will bring down inflation, they will also bring some pain to households and businesses. These are the unfortunate costs of reducing inflation. But a failure to restore price stability would mean far greater pain.”  – Fed Chairman, Jerome Powell Jackson Hole Speech August 26, 2022

Boy, that pain escalated quickly. Markets, both equity and fixed income, finally took Chair Powell at his word as investment sentiment shifted dramatically this quarter. Prior to the Federal Reserve’s annual August retreat in Jackson Hole, the U.S. equity market had rallied 17% from the June lows thru mid-August. For some reason, the markets sensed, incorrectly, the Fed was going to moderate its interest rate increases. Fed officials, especially Chair Powell, thought market participants were too complacent, misreading their intentions to slow the economy to combat high inflation. This perceived “pivot” was making the Fed’s job harder. Powell decided to send the markets a message and tossed the punchbowl into one of the Teton’s beautiful mountain streams.

Then the markets woke up to the fact that Chair Powell was becoming Mr. Tough Guy, a la Paul Volker, and the machines kicked into gear, dumping stocks, bonds, and crypto, indiscriminately right up until the market close at 4:00 pm Friday, September 30. To make matters worse this quarter, central banks around the world also moved to combat the effects of rising inflation as banks from South Africa to Norway raised rates. When the Bank of England raised rates for the seventh time in a row, things started to break. The risks of a significant policy mistake leading to a global contagion started to heighten. Currencies started trading widely, and the British pound cratered to its lowest point in 37 years. Long-term U.K. Government bonds, or Gilts, flash crashed, losing a third of their value in four days going into the end of the quarter. While world markets were getting unstable, the U.S. dollar was soaring in contrast, along with U.S. Treasury yields, triggering the quantitative trading algorithms used by the massive macro commodity trading advisors (CTA’s) to drive ETF and index funds to dump stocks and bonds. The cherry on the top of the sundae of pain was a scary echo from 2008, another possible “Lehman moment” as fears surfaced that Credit Suisse, a globally systemically important bank was on the brink of collapse.

 


 

Read our full investment commentary and letter to clients by downloading the third quarter 2022 letter.

Read our full investment commentary and letter to clients by downloading the Q2 2022 quarterly letter.

“I think this is among, if not the most complex, dynamic environments I’ve ever seen in my career. We’ve obviously been through lots of cycles. But the confluence of the number of shocks to the system, to me, is unprecedented.” – John Waldron, Goldman Sachs

The S&P 500 just experienced its worst first half in over fifty years and its second-worst start to the year since 1935. Bonds, which typically perform well in times of market weakness, have become positively correlated with equities, leaving balanced investors with essentially nowhere to hide. Long-term treasury bonds lost 20.1 % in the first half, essentially matching the S&P 500 decline of 19.96%. Much of the decline can be attributed to inflation, which the Fed had assumed would be transitory, but has turned out to be more persistent than expected. This has forced central banks globally to pivot from holding rates near zero to a “hawkish” stance in an attempt to stem inflationary pressures. The S&P 500 has officially entered a new bear market (peak-to-trough decline of 20%), the 27th bear market since 1929. The worry is that central bank actions could push the global economy into recession. The chart from JP Morgan Asset Management below suggests that all of the market decline through the first half of the year can be attributed to price/earnings multiple compression. However, we are aware that with economic weakness, earnings will be under pressure to meet expectations over the next few quarters.

 


 

Read our full investment commentary and letter to clients by downloading the second quarter 2022 letter.