Author Archives: Bill Collier

Read our full investment commentary here.

“A 10% decline in the market is fairly common—it happens about once a year. Investors who realize this are less likely to sell in a panic, and more likely to remain invested, benefitting from the wealth building power of stocks” – Christopher Davis

Market Statistics as of 3/31/26

Market Stats as of 3/31/2026

The first quarter of 2026 (Q1 2026) was a tale of two markets for many of the indices and very reminiscent of Q1 2025 where value stocks outperformed growth stocks and bonds. The markets were trending higher for most of the first quarter until the air strikes began on February 28 and the resulting peak to trough S&P 500 decline of 9.1% pushed the markets close to the 10% decline that Wall Street characterizes as a correction. We actually hit that level in early April but have regained much of those losses since then. We have said in many quarterly letters and calls over the years that these markets can move extremely quickly and violently in both directions depending upon headlines and how the algorithms interpret the data. We know that these minute to minute and day to day gyrations are usually not indicative of the true value of the underlying businesses we invest in. Therefore, we try to tune out much of the “noise” and look out for where we believe the earnings will be trending in the future. Earnings season is quickly approaching, and we will be listening to how the current situation in the Middle East is affecting our companies.

As you can see from the chart above, gold was the best performing asset in Q1 (just like Q1 2025) followed by mid caps (S&P Mid Cap) and value stocks (Russell 1000 Value). Within the S&P 500 market internals, energy led the way and was the only sector to post gains in March, (10.40%) and (38.20%) in Q1, its best quarter since Q1 ’22. Whether energy prices are higher for longer or based on the war is a major issue. Many oil pundits claim there is a worldwide glut of oil, but rig counts and global drilling suggest something different. Like we say, it takes two sides to make a market, and we are paying close attention to the matter. Materials (9.30%) was the next best sector followed by utilities (7.52%), consumer staples (7.01%), industrials (4.30%) and real estate (1.94%). On the downside, the financials sector (-9.80%) led the way and was followed by consumer discretionary (-9.34%), information technology (-9.25%), communication services (-7.10%) and health care (-5.29%).

Thoughts from Tiburon

“There is an excitable dog on a very long leash, darting randomly in every direction. At any moment, there is no predicting which way the pooch will lurch. He leaps randomly from one direction to the next, stops to smell every leaf, barks at other dogs. And jumps behind you for no reason. His movements are totally unpredictable.

But in the long run, you know he is heading northeast at an average speed of three miles per hour, because that’s where the owner is taking him. What is astonishing is that almost all of the market players, big and small, seem to have their eye on the dog, and not the owner.” – Ralph Wagner

Markets since Iran conflict starter

EPS=earnings per share. EM=emerging markets. Returns from 02.27.26 close to 03.31.2026 close. MSCI index returns in USD. Sources: Bloomberg L.P.; FactSet; BNY.

In February, the conflict with Iran increased market volatility. The analogy of Mr. Wagner’s quote is important to note during times of increased VIX. Said another way, stock price does not equal business valuation. Stock price reflects the valuation plus or minus current sentiment, which can create opportunities for investors. As reflected in the chart above, most asset classes declined following the onset of the conflict, with the exception of oil and the U.S. dollar. A key risk we continue to monitor is the potential impact on overall economic growth, particularly as higher gas prices affect broad segments of the economy. An important concern is whether higher interest rates will prove persistent. While expectations entering 2026 included approximately 50 basis points of rate cuts, current market pricing reflects no cuts, with some projections now pointing to potential rate increases. While moderate rate increases are manageable, returns tend to suffer if rates rise too fast or too high.

Market strategist Charlie Biello recently noted the US bond market has now been in a drawdown for 68 months, by far the longest in history, as illustrated in the chart below. This has resulted in additional losses for investors trying to stretch their maturities out further to increase their yields. Rest assured, we have taken and continue to take a very conservative approach to our fixed income investments with investment grade quality and short-term maturities being our strategy. We view our fixed income money as a safe haven, not meant for aggressive capital appreciation and undue risk.

For most of the past decade, the group of tech stocks called the Magnificent 7 (“MAG 7” ) have outperformed. The strength in this group made the term a household name. Recently, a new theme has emerged called HALO (Heavy Assets, Low Obsolescence). Highlighted by Goldman Sachs Research, the strategy targets businesses with significant physical assets that are difficult to replicate due to high costs, regulation, long build times, or engineering complexity, and that retain long‑term economic relevance. Examples include utilities, grids, pipelines, transportation infrastructure, critical machinery, and long‑cycle industrial capacity.

The valuation gap between capital‑intensive and capital‑light businesses has narrowed meaningfully. Although fund flows increasingly favor HALO assets, positioning remains relatively light as investors diversify away from crowded technology names. While rotation toward these sectors appears underway, long‑term allocations are still modest.
Technology remains overweight by historical standards, while sectors such as energy, utilities, and materials are underrepresented. Even a modest reallocation could drive significant upside, though the durability of this strategy in algorithm‑driven markets remains uncertain.

As we have said in many (maybe all) of these quarterly newsletters, our primary concern is protecting our clients’ capital while generating strong risk-adjusted returns that ensure peace of mind. We are constantly focused on the companies we invest in and are prepared to make the necessary adjustments when needed. Our investment team boasts a wealth of experience, having navigated numerous corrections and bear markets. Each market downturn is unique and usually the result of something not obvious, but they all are driven by fear and greed. We hope our experience and knowledge provide you with a sense of security and confidence. As always, thank you for your trust in us.

Portfolio Activity in the First Quarter 2026

Portfolio activity for the Value strategy was light with some trimming and adding to existing positions where our weightings were over or under our desired target sizes. We did exit a very small position in Solstice (SOLS), which was a recent spinoff from Honeywell (HON) and one we did not want to add to our Value strategy.

We added Lennar (LEN) to our Garp Model in January. LEN is the 2nd largest homebuilder in the US. LEN transitioned from a traditional builder into a capital light version by offloading long-term land development risks to third-party partners (like Millrose Properties). This “asset light” model allows them to control land with less money upfront. This should free up cash flow and in turn produce higher ROIC. We believe the current housing shortage will provide a long-term tailwind for this company.

Additionally, we trimmed our position in Alphabet (GOOG) in January. Google was and remains one of our top equity positions. The strength in the stock created an outsized position in some accounts. We continued to like the business, just thought it made sense to take some chips off the table.

In the International strategy we added London Stock Exchange (LSEGY). LESGY is a leading global financial infrastructure and data provider, like Bloomberg, S&P Global, and Intercontinental Exchange. With 44,000 customers in 170 countries, the company is integral to providing data and plumbing to the global financial system, utilizing a recurring revenue model. During the recent “SaaSmageddon” selloff, subscription-based software and data providers were broadly and indiscriminately sold. We viewed this dislocation as an attractive opportunity to initiate a position in a business whose earnings power is driven primarily by high-quality, recurring revenues.


DISCLOSURES:

This material is not financial advice or an offer to sell any product and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any particular security. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The opinions expressed are those of the Live Oak Private Wealth Management Investment Team. The opinions referenced are as of the date of publication and are subject to change due to changes in the market or economic conditions and may not necessarily come to pass.

Live Oak Private Wealth is a subsidiary of Live Oak Bank. Investment advisory services are offered through LOPW, LLC, an Independent Registered Investment Advisor. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Live Oak Private Wealth, including our advisory services, fees, and objectives, can be found in our ADV Part 2A and/or Form CRS, which is available upon request.

This should not be construed as tax advice. You should always consult with your tax professional with regard to specific tax questions and obligations.

“I see concentration risk everywhere I look.”
– Paul Tudor Jones

Market Statistics as of 09/30/25

The third quarter of 2025 was the strongest Q3 since 2020 with all asset classes positive and many indices having double digit returns. As you can see from the chart above, growth continues to lead value and within the growth sector, small cap (Russell 2000) outperformed large cap growth for the first time since Q3 2021. Market participants seem to remain infatuated with the Artificial Intelligence (AI) trade as many of the Magnificent 7 soared to all-time highs during the quarter, and a few new companies have recently become market darlings as well. In fact, Jim Cramer recently announced his new acronym for the latest group, PARC, which consists of Palantir, AppLovin, Robinhood and Coinbase. The gamification of the markets we have discussed in past letters continues.

Gold continued to shine the brightest as the metal gained 16.36% for the quarter and leads all asset classes year to date with a whopping 46.6% return. Gold was up 11.55% in September alone—its best month since November 2009. The leadership of gold, small cap and technology/telecom in the quarter was an unusual trio: historically (since 1989) gold has had close to zero correlation with those asset classes. Perhaps gold is warning us of the outlook for the US dollar, given the massive debt load of the US government and the high inflation we have been experiencing. One thing is certain: we as a nation cannot continue to spend more than we take in without continuing to endanger our role as the world’s reserve currency.

Within the S&P 500 index internals, the technology (+13.04%) and communication services (+11.82%) sectors were the biggest winners. Again, not surprisingly as the AI craze continued. Consumer discretionary stocks were the third best group as the sector returned (+9.36%). The utilities sector was up a big (+6.84%) as the perceived demand for AI data center power needs fueled the gains. Energy (+5.26%), followed by industrials (+4.56%), healthcare (+3.27%), financials (+2.86%), materials (+2.63%) and real estate (+1.73%) round out the positive sectors. Only the consumer staples (2.90%) sector had negative returns as the rotation out of safe havens gave way to the risk on trade.

We have written in many newsletters over the years about our focus on valuation and the close attention paid to managing our client’s money for solid risk-adjusted returns. Interestingly, Richard Bernstein of Richard Bernstein Advisors (RBA), recently wrote a research report using the “Tortoise and Hare” analogy to illustrate the eerily similar returns of utilities and the NASDAQ composite over the last 50 years. The power of lower volatility and compounding dividends allowed these “stodgy” investments to keep pace with the faster growing companies often associated with the NASDAQ. We remain cautiously optimistic about investing in top-tier companies with strong balance sheets and income statements, great management teams and industry-leading business models. The S&P 500 currently trades at 23x earnings yet the equal-weight S&P 500 trades at a more reasonable 17x earnings. There are always opportunities in the marketplace, and our job is identifying these businesses and being ready to invest in them when the price is attractive.

Just yesterday, famed hedge fund investor Paul Tudor Jones was on CNBC comparing this current market and its infatuation with AI to the dot-com bubble in 1999. His perspective suggested both opportunity and caution. He noted that unlike 1999, when the Federal Reserve was implementing rate hikes, today’s market is anticipating rate cuts. The contrast extends to fiscal policy as well. While 1999-2000 featured a budget surplus, today’s economy operates with a 6% budget deficit. While no one knows just how the markets will act, it is anyone’s guess. For full disclosure, Jones was bearish earlier this summer when the markets were all trading below several technical indicators before grinding higher to new highs as the markets climbed the proverbial wall of worry.

Jim Bianco of Bianco Research just posted that JP Morgan has identified 41 “AI-related” stocks in the S&P 500 index that make up 45% of the S&P 500. This illustrates just how top heavy the index is in AI companies and how distorted index returns may be due to this concentration. We try to stress the fact that this popular index is not as broad and diversified as people think it is. It has morphed into a concentrated technology driven index.

In fact, as the table below shows, the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) have the same eight largest stocks. So much for diversification! It is obvious just how concentrated these indexes are in technology companies. We think it is imperative for our clients to know this and realize the inherent risk of investing in a passive index fund while believing it offers a lot of diversification. Our active styles of investing allow us to broadly diversify portfolio risk through both sector allocation and stock selection while focusing on valuation and risk adjusted returns.

We remain laser focused on the companies we invest in and are prepared to make adjustments when needed. Our primary focus is protecting our client’s capital while aiming to generate strong risk-adjusted returns that ensure peace of mind. Our investment team has a wealth of experience, having navigated numerous bear markets and corrections. We hope our expertise will provide you with a sense of security and confidence.

Portfolio Activity in the Third Quarter 2025

During the quarter, the Value strategy exited our position in Oracle (ORCL) on a strong positive market reaction to earnings but mostly due to valuation. We were fortunate to have bought shares significantly lower two years ago and felt Oracle shares were no longer characteristic of a value stock in our opinion. We also sold our position in Pfizer (PFE) on a strong earnings report that we felt gave us a good exit price. The company faces patent issues over the next few years which we felt would weigh on the stock price. We recently purchased Honeywell (HON) shares as we believe the shares offer excellent risk adjusted return potential over the next couple of years as the company splits into three separate companies (Advanced Materials, Automation and Aerospace) where we think they will be more valuable as separate entities than they are as a conglomerate. Activist investor Elliot Management has been pushing Honeywell in this direction for some time now.

There were no new purchases or sales in the international strategy during the quarter, but there was one sale and one purchase in the GARP strategy. We sold our position in CarMax after disappointing sales and earnings as the market continues to favor asset light auto sales companies like Carvana. We purchased shares in WillScott Holdings, one of the leaders in flexible, modular space and storage solutions. We feel like the company will benefit from onshoring and infrastructure renewal projects in the US as well as new industrial projects like data centers, battery plants, etc.

As always, should you wish to inquire more about our thoughts and processes, please feel free to reach out to any of us. We welcome the dialogue and consider it an honor to have your trust and confidence in managing your capital and investment needs.

*Not every client account will have these exact holdings. The actual holdings with respect to any particular client account will vary based on a number of factors including but not limited to: (i) the size of the account, (ii) investment restrictions applicable to the account, if any; and (iii) market exigencies at the time of investment.


DISCLOSURES:

This material is not financial advice or an offer to sell any product and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any particular security. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The opinions expressed are those of the Live Oak Private Wealth Management Investment Team. The opinions referenced are as of the date of publication and are subject to change due to changes in the market or economic conditions and may not necessarily come to pass.

Live Oak Private Wealth is a subsidiary of Live Oak Bank. Investment advisory services are offered through LOPW, LLC, an Independent Registered Investment Advisor. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Live Oak Private Wealth, including our advisory services, fees, and objectives, can be found in our ADV Part 2A and/or Form CRS, which is available upon request.

This should not be construed as tax advice. You should always consult with your tax professional with regard to specific tax questions and obligations.